Third Party Viewer policy change from LL puts third party viewers at risk

Share this

At 2pm PST yesterday (friday 2/24) Linden Labs announced that they will change the policy for third party viewers. This change brings a lot of discussion material to the table, as they seem to want to eliminate all third party viewers without actually ban them.

The most discussed change is section 2.k, that states that third party viewers will not be allowed to have any features that the latest version of the Linden Labs viewer doesn’t have. This affects things like Firestorms built in video recorder and avatar radar and the Phoenix object radar.

It also means that V1 and V2-based viewers are at risk, since some of those features have been removed in the LL V3.

Another big change is 2.i and 2.j that states that no system information is allowed to be transmitted to other viewers, and both Firestorm and Phoenix tag system is based on the fact that they can show what viewer others are on. This will affect those viewers ability to show other peoples viewers and also, due to some system specific coding, the ability to change color of the tags.

The complete change, and the LL response is shown bellow.

2.a.iii : You must not provide any feature that circumvents any privacy protection option made available through a Linden Lab viewer or any Second Life service.

2.i : You must not display any information regarding the computer system, software, or network connection of any other Second Life user.

2.j : You must not include any information regarding the computer system, software, or network connection of the user in any messages sent to other viewers, except when explicitly elected by the user of your viewer.

2.k : You must not provide any feature that alters the shared experience of the virtual world in any way not provided by or accessible to users of the latest released Linden Lab viewer

We encourage Third Party Developers to continue innovating with unique user interfaces, niche features, and ways of interacting with the virtual world, and we look forward to working in partnership with developers on ideas they have for new or improved shared experiences for all of Second Life. We want to incorporate more innovative new features into Second Life to improve the experience for all users, and we encourage TPV developers to submit proposals through our standard process.

Will this mark the end of SL, or is it something that the third party developers will work around? Who knows, but my bet is that LL will someday realize that the users wants more than they are willing to deliver.

5 thoughts on “Third Party Viewer policy change from LL puts third party viewers at risk

  1. This is ridiculous.LL has repeatedly tried to bounce all 3rd party viewers.How about this LL maybe if you made a user friendly viewer with out taking a ton of screen space up then I would use your viewer.Its like going into a spaceship to go to work.instead of using a car.Alot of needless boxes sprouting up from the side.I wouldnt use the firestorm til they made all the side boxes go away .So its not the third party viewers who need to change it is LL that has to change.This is the first time in my life where I played a game and had to jump thru hoops to play it>So my question to LL is why do you treat us like we are a problem and realize we are customers.Novel idea?

  2. How does something like Firestorm’s built-in video recorder alter anyone’s shared experience of SL?

    My understanding of the policy is that it only catches things that affect other people’s experience of SL as well as your own. An example given at the meeting was Emerald’s “illegal” attachment points, which everyone could see, but only looked right in a TPV that supported them.

    1. Depends on how you look at it. From a point of view, recording movies might cause lag or glitching for the person recording, thus lowering the experience. On another viewpoint, since the LL viewer doesn’t have this, it might be seen by another as a feature that enhances the Firestorm users when they have to get other third party software to do the same thing.

      1. But what is “shared” about the experience of recording movies? If I’m standing next to you on a sim and you’re recording a movie, what part of your experience of making the recording am I sharing? If your recording the movie has some effect on my experience (makes things laggy for me too, for example), then yes, I can see it, but how otherwise?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.